중국상대 집단소송

우한 폐렴 발생 사실을 두 달 동안 은폐하여 각국이 대비할 시간도 없이 전세계적으로 창궐하게 만든 주범인 중국을 상대로 집단 소송이 시작되었다.

한국의 우한 폐렴 피해자들도 중국을 상대로 집단 소송을 시작하고, 국내 중국 자산에 대한 가압류부터 시작하는 것이 좋을 것이다.

이런 일을 다시 겪지 않으려면 세계적으로 인류를 위협하는 중국 공산당 해체 운동에 들어갈 필요가 있다.

인도의 경우

PIL To Be Filed In Supreme Court Of India For Coronavirus Epidemic Against China, Investigation Already Going On The Role Of WHO, ICJ Can Also Be Approached inventiva -April 5, 2020

Inventiva plans to file PIL in the supreme court of India through lawyer Oorja Bhogal after the lockdown is over to request Honorable judges of the supreme court for demanding legal damages of 1 Trillion USD be deposited in the reserve bank of India within 60 days by Chinese authorities and government of PRC for the damages and loss of business, economy and financial losses suffered by the Indian citizens and its government under the effect of coronavirus pandemic, failing to comply with this order will result in a complete ban on the sale of any Chinese products, their import and sales in India for life.

영국 Henry Jackson Society의 예측

영국의 Henry Jackson Society^[1]는 중국의 COVID-19 대응 방식의 국제보건규약 위반에 대한 전세계의 소송은 G7 국가들로부터만도 최소 3.2조 파운드(£3.2 trillion, 대략 4조 달러)에 달할 것으로 예측했다.

Coronavirus Compensation? Assessing China's Potential Culpability and Avenues of Legal Response. - Henry Jackson Society 5th April 2020

Global lawsuits against China for “patent breaches” of the International Health Regulations over its handling of COVID-19 could run to at least £3.2 trillion from just the nations of the G7, according to a newly released report.

The report claims that the Chinese government’s early handling of the disease and failure to adequately report information to the WHO breached Articles Six and Seven of the International Health Regulations [IHRs], a Treaty to which China is a signatory and legally obliged to uphold. These breaches allowed the outbreak to rapidly spread outside Wuhan, its place of origin.

In particular, our research has discovered that the Chinese government:

Failed to disclose data that would have revealed evidence of human-to-human transmission for a period of up to three weeks from being aware of it, in breach of Articles six and seven of the IHRs.
Provided the WHO with erroneous information about the number of infections between 2 January 2020 and 11 January 2020, in breach of Articles Six and Seven of the IHRs.
Failed to proscribe avoidable vectors of lethal zoonotic (animal-originated) viral infection, instead actively promoting the massive proliferation of dangerous viral host species for human consumption in breach of Article 12 of the International Covenant on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights.
Allowed 5 million people (roughly equivalent to the size of The San Francisco Metropolitan Area, CA or Greater Boston, MA in the USA, and roughly five times the size of a city the size of Birmingham, UK) to leave Wuhan before imposing the lockdown on 23 January 2020 despite knowledge of human-to-human transmission.